Genepax’s announcement of a fuel system powered by water has been generating some buzz (see my previous post on the announcement).
To over simplify things for the layman (and I am one of them, so if there are errors, please educate me) the use of water as an energy source requires another source to force the separation of water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. Genepax claims that their system uses a membrane electrode assembly (MEA), which contains a material that allows the necessary chemical reaction to convert water into an energy source.
Some people have slammed Genepax’s invention as impossible since it defies the principles of physics, or as Mark Chu-Carroll calls it, “Perpetual Motion via Fuel Cell.” They say that there must be a hidden energy source operating Genepax’s system, such as batteries, and Genepax is orchestrating a complete fraud to lure gullible, science-illiterate venture capitalists to invest.
But should we be so quick to dismiss whatever Genepax has to say? Science has long had a history of disagreeing what is possible or not. It was only fifty years ago did most physicists dismiss Hugh Everett’s PhD dissertation on parallel worlds. Today, many physicists have come to reexamine Everett’s work and the idea of parallel worlds is now part of modern astrophysics.
Does it cost us anything to keep an open mind? Genepax is schedule to hold an English press conference soon where they will demonstrate their system to foreign media. During that demonstration, I think it would be fair for Genepax to allow someone to closely securitize and examine their prototype car and system to make sure there is not a hidden power source. If Genepax allows that, would this cause the naysayers to reexamine things?